Wherefore the Free P2P Band & Fighting the RIAA
26 Oct 7 am
Why did the band Harvy Danger decide to release their entire September, 2005 album, Little By Little, for free P2P distribution and download, on the net? Read the full statement here. The precis begins:
Why we’re releasing our latest album for free on the Internet
In preparing to self-release our new album, we thought long and hard about how best to use the internet. Given our unusual history, and a long-held sense that the practice now being demonized by the music biz as “illegal” file sharing can be a friend to the independent musician, we have decided to embrace the indisputable fact of music in the 21st century, put our money where our mouth is, and make our record, Little By Little…, available for download via Bittorrent, and at our website. We’re not streaming, or offering 30-second song samples, or annoying you with digital rights management software; we’re putting up the whole record, for free, forever. Full stop. Please help yourself; if you like it, please share with friends.
Of course, the CD will also be for sale on the site, as well as in fine independent record stores across the country, in a deluxe package that includes a 30-minute bonus disc that serves as a companion piece to the record proper (retail price for the package is $11.99).
We embark on this experiment with both enthusiasm and curiosity—and, ok, maybe a twinge of anxiety. Why are we doing this? The short answer is simply that we want a lot of people to hear the record. However, it’s important that people understand the free download concept isn’t a frivolous act. It’s a key part of our promotional campaign . . .
Also of note,
Tanya Andersen, a 41 year old disabled single mother living in Oregon, has countersued the RIAA for Oregon RICO violations, fraud, invasion of privacy, abuse of process, electronic trespass, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, negligent misrepresentation, the tort of “outrage", and deceptive business practices, Ms. Andersen’s counterclaims demand a trial by jury. (List of 65 allegations against the RIAA follows, in original article)
(As reported by isohunt:) This follows another recent US court ruling that mum can’t be held responsible for 13-year old daughter’s file sharing. While the RIAA’s lawsuits to protect its copyright is not “illegal” and are within their right (under laws they lobbied for), perhaps this case will shed some light on their extortionist behaviour.







